Have they always been plastic? I bought my SR rail mount in '04 and seem to recall them being metal as I've not had to touch the mount since other than tightening the crossbolts that hold the base to the barrelPigeon wrote:It is a shame for Blaser that they make this fuzzy insert from plastic - therefor the full performance of the Swarovski SR rail could not be used. It should have been milled from metal instead! This is just a cheap way Blaser goes for saving a bunch of money.
Well, mostly I have seen this happen, when the screws have not been tightened enough (but normaly the recoil should not be transferred by friction from the SR-rail to the scope mount, and therefor it should be independent from the screw´s torque given, but it is not with just the Blaser scope mount.
Call Blaser for a free spare part - they should know how much manure they produce with that cheap plastic insert!!! If they tell You, this is not normal: I have seen more then just this... ! Promised .
Use a torque wrench next time and load the screws to the maxmum torque possible and secure them with Loctite 243.
Or call me if You want some metal insert instead
Now that you've got me curious, and pondering if a recently discovered 5cm shift in elevation with that scope isnt just due to degraded handloads , what is the correct torque for the SR feet screws?
And on the topic of recoil, have you seen the round lug of Blaser saddlemounts get deformed/scarred from contacting (an unusually sharp?) edge of the divot in the barrel? Is this normal?
Sorry for the Vaughan but once again someones trials and tribulations end up most edifying for even those of us without BBF/BB 95-97s