9.3x62 Load?

This forum is for discussion of all reloading-related topics. Sponsored by Shooting Shed-UK

Moderators: deerhunter338mag, Vaughan, stokesrj

User avatar
retrieverman
Meister der jagd
Posts: 2589
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Texas

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by retrieverman »

I load for my 9.3x62 and x74, and using PRVI 285 gr bullets and excluding the initial brass cost, my loads cost me about 40 cents per shot. For me, it is well worth loading my own.Image
Image

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10060
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by deerhunter338mag »

SPEEDY wrote:Have you tried AR2206H with anything other then the 270gn pills?
I have loaded the Tug's the Hydros the 250gr woodleigh and the 286gr with that powder mate works fine don't need as much to get the speed hits hard and with the blaser barrels very accurate with them and not much playing around you can get them all in a cup at 100 meters.
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

User avatar
Gun Barrel Ecologist
Moderator
Posts: 5076
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by Gun Barrel Ecologist »

Am I remembering correctly that you use the 250g Woody RNSP on sambar? Any bullets recovered?

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10060
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by deerhunter338mag »

Gun Barrel Ecologist wrote:Am I remembering correctly that you use the 250g Woody RNSP on sambar? Any bullets recovered?
I have only tried them on Fallow last week and that was the only one that I recovered. The rest took off somewhere :lol: I left it sitting in the tree where we cut the deer up :doh: But it mushroomed nicely and didn't lose much if any at all. A few years back a mate shot a spiky Sambar with one up the ass and one in the side with 250gr woodleigh's out of his 338mag good shots but the deer ran. I tracked it and it seen me and took off like it had some outstanding warrants or something. I let a 300gr woodleigh out of my 338mag go and it hit the deck. I told him to go the 300gr and he did for a bit but was Impatient with load development and went back to the 250gr's must like walking and losing deer or something like that. I would always go the tug on sambar. Guy's I know and the guru have been using them for many many years they try new stuff then go back to them. I think the Tug would be an unreal pill on Buff.
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

Londonhunter

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by Londonhunter »

Most wonderful caliber

You can load

156 grains 10 grams to 325 grains for angry things

So versatile

I have tried varget 4350 and there is virtually no need for load development at all

User avatar
Gun Barrel Ecologist
Moderator
Posts: 5076
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by Gun Barrel Ecologist »

Interesting, as Varget is what we know as AR 2208

Londonhunter

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by Londonhunter »

I am sorry but in my part of the world I only know of varget as being a suitable powder for the 9.3

NE450No2
Meister der jagd
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:56 pm

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by NE450No2 »

For you guys in Australia the 268gr Woodleigh Soft would be my bullet of choice for the big stuff, backed up by 286gr Woodleigh Solids.

They have worked great in my 9,3x74R.

If you want a more pointed bullet the 286gr Nosler Partition is a great choice as well.

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10060
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by deerhunter338mag »

NE450No2 wrote:For you guys in Australia the 268gr Woodleigh Soft would be my bullet of choice for the big stuff, backed up by 286gr Woodleigh Solids.

They have worked great in my 9,3x74R.

If you want a more pointed bullet the 286gr Nosler Partition is a great choice as well.
Woodleighs make a great projectile in my 338winmag with a 300gr snrn I have never lost a sambar or had to go look for one regardless of shot placement they hit bloody hard. But for the 9.3x62 I know the RWS Tugs have the wood over them still and my 1st shot on sambar will be the tug. As for Fallow I have tried Tug, Hydros and the 250gr and the 250gr worked the best. The tugs well i may as well used a hand grenade on them, the Hydros the same but the woodleigh 250gr work very well and the projectile was recovered. It just comes down to the came you hunt and what works best. A good mate was using the 250gr woodleighs in his 338winmag and main times I told him to go to the next size up and after 2 deer run off and had to look for them he went the 300gr. However he is a bit of an impatient person and needed to put a new stock on his rifle with out properly fitting it the rifle will not get a good grouping now with the 300gr so his gone back to the 250gr. :think:
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

Londonhunter

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by Londonhunter »

Hi since you are located in Australia, may I be rude to ask how much are retail price for hydrostatic stabilised woodleighs ?

We are being charged a fortune here in England

These are wonderful bullets and I wonder if itis at all legal for autralia gunships to post them to us in England ?

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10060
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by deerhunter338mag »

Londonhunter wrote:Hi since you are located in Australia, may I be rude to ask how much are retail price for hydrostatic stabilised woodleighs ?

We are being charged a fortune here in England

These are wonderful bullets and I wonder if itis at all legal for autralia gunships to post them to us in England ?
Londonhunter there not that cheap out here as well. if you go to gun shows or Deer hunting meetings and the guy that makes them is there you might pick them up for $40 a pack of 20. But at gun shops anywhere between $50 and $60+ for a pack of 20. They have made them for every cal but will most likely never release most of them. The 22lr and the 243 might of been worth a look at.
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

User avatar
icebug
Meister der jagd
Posts: 1153
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: all over the world

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by icebug »

This might be a bit OT, but did anyone try loading subsonics for 9.3x62? :confusion-scratchheadyellow:
I'd use Woodleigh 320 Grain Weldcore Round Nose Soft Point bullets and Lapua brass.
All for one and 9.3 for all
https://youtu.be/8r-e2NDSTuE

Londonhunter

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by Londonhunter »

I like the way you put it

I have a shooting buddie and since retirement got the subsonic bug

Even though the twist does not support it he is working on a subsonic load for his 9.3 with 325 grain

I must show his your post he will be on the floor in no time

User avatar
icebug
Meister der jagd
Posts: 1153
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: all over the world

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by icebug »

Blaser's twist (1:14.2) should stabilize that bullet, therefore I believe it could be a pretty accurate and effective round at ranges up to 100 meters.

LMK what your buddy says.
All for one and 9.3 for all
https://youtu.be/8r-e2NDSTuE

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10060
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3x62 Load?

Post by deerhunter338mag »

icebug wrote:This might be a bit OT, but did anyone try loading subsonics for 9.3x62? :confusion-scratchheadyellow:
I'd use Woodleigh 320 Grain Weldcore Round Nose Soft Point bullets and Lapua brass.
yep 19gr of trail boss with a 293gr Tug or uni classic going at about 1050fps :D no kick at all
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

Post Reply

Return to “Reloading”